Which of the following is not required when tagging or marking evidence?

When tagging or marking evidence, it is essential to include specific information that helps to preserve the integrity and chain of custody of the evidence. One critical component is the name of the collecting officer, which establishes accountability and allows for tracing the evidence back to the individual responsible for its collection. This is crucial in legal proceedings, as the identity of the collector can impact the credibility of the evidence.

Additionally, the date of collection is vital in tracking when the evidence was obtained, helping to establish a timeline of events related to the crime. This aspect is important for investigations and can affect the relevance of the evidence in court.

The agency case number is also necessary to link the evidence to a specific investigation or case, ensuring that all items are appropriately cataloged and can be referenced in future legal proceedings.

In contrast, indicating the type of crime committed is not strictly required when tagging or marking evidence. While it may provide context about the evidence, it does not affect the basic requirements for the tagging process itself, which focuses more on identification and tracking of the physical evidence.