Which of the following is NOT one of the situational use of force options?

The situational use of force options refer to various methods that law enforcement officers are trained to use when responding to different scenarios, with the goal of controlling a situation safely and effectively. Each of the first three options—officer presence, strikes, and verbal commands—are recognized tactical responses within law enforcement where the level of force or interaction escalates depending on the circumstances encountered.

Officer presence involves simply being there in uniform, which can often deter criminal activity or defuse a potentially volatile situation. Strikes refer to physical interventions that may be necessary to control a suspect who is resisting arrest or poses a threat. Verbal commands are used to issue clear instructions to individuals, allowing officers to manage situations and promote compliance without the need for physical force.

Surveillance techniques, on the other hand, are not a form of force but rather a method of observation and intelligence gathering. They do not involve direct engagement with individuals and therefore do not fit into the category of use of force options, which focus on active responses to situations involving potential threats or conflicts. Thus, this differentiates surveillance techniques from the options that do pertain to direct forms of force or intervention, making it the correct response to identify as not being one of the situational use of force options.