Which is not considered a non-deadly force option?

In the context of law enforcement, non-deadly force options are techniques and methods used to control a subject without causing serious injury or death. Firearms, by their nature, are designed to inflict significant harm or lethality, which places them firmly in the category of deadly force.

Strikes, police canines, and compliance techniques are typically used to manage a situation without resorting to lethal means. Strikes might involve defensive tactics aimed at gaining control or creating distance but are designed to minimize injury. Police canines are used to assist officers in apprehending suspects or controlling situations in a manner that does not involve direct lethal force. Compliance techniques, such as holds or restraints, focus on encouraging a subject to comply without injury.

Understanding the distinction between non-deadly and deadly force is crucial for law enforcement personnel, as it directly relates to their use of force continuum and the legal standards that govern their actions. Thus, while strikes, canines, and compliance techniques are all strategies aimed at non-lethal engagement, firearms are explicitly classified as a deadly force option.