Under what scenario is deadly force permitted according to Tennessee v. Garner?

In Tennessee v. Garner, the U.S. Supreme Court established that law enforcement officers may use deadly force against a fleeing suspect if the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others. This landmark case clarified the circumstances under which police may lawfully use lethal force, emphasizing the necessity of an imminent threat to justify such an extreme measure.

In this context, the correct scenario involves a fleeing suspect who is perceived as a significant threat, meaning that the circumstances must indicate that the suspect poses a serious danger to life. The ruling underscores the principle that the use of deadly force cannot be arbitrary but must be based on the threat level presented by the individual in question.

The other scenarios do not align with the legal standards set forth by the Garner decision. Factors like preventing double jeopardy, recognizing a non-threatening suspect, or decisions made solely by a senior officer do not constitute valid justifications for using deadly force under the legal guidance established in this case.